By Benjamin Seiler
"If all that Americans want is security, they can go to prison.
They'll have enough to eat, a bed and a roof over their heads.
But if an American wants to preserve his dignity and his equality
as a human being, he must not bow his neck to any dictatorial
government."
Dwight D. Eisenhower, U.S. President (1953-1961)
Seldom before have Americans been more divided than after the
re-election of President Bush. The image of the USA throughout
the rest of the world is likewise in tatters. The solidarity
and compassion shown America by the world community in the wake
of the September 11th attacks have all but vanished, with few
exceptions. Where The West once stood behind the USA in unity,
now consternation, bewilderment, and rage prevail. It is two
wars, among other things, which are at fault here: wars which,
under the guise of false pretenses, the most powerful nation
in the world chomped at the bit to prosecute.

Bloody Oil
The war in Afghanistan was ostensibly America's response
to 9/11. The Taliban regime, which was protecting al-Qaeda,
was supposed to have been taken out, and the head of Osama bin
Laden laid at the feet of President Bush. But the fact is that
on July 11, 2001, senior officials in the U.S. State Department
held a meeting in Berlin with secret service operatives from
Russia and Pakistan, and informed them about an offensive action
by the U.S. military in Afghanistan scheduled for October 2001
- two months prior to September 11th! There was no "war
on terror" at the time to justify this invasion plan, but instead
the desire to replace the Taliban regime with a government that
would be "more sensitive to the needs of American oil interests."
In the 1990's, the Taliban had signed an agreement with Unocal
Oil Company, which envisioned the construction of an oil
pipeline from Kazakhstan through Afghanistan and Pakistan to
the Indian Ocean. Although the Taliban gladly accepted American
money (on May 8, 2001, Secretary of State Colin Powell agreed
to pay the mullahs US $ 43 million) they consistently opposed
plans for the new pipeline. But after having barely served one
day in office, Afghanistan's newly-elected President Karzai,
a former executive at an American oil firm, gave the green light
to the pipeline construction.
The war in Iraq was not
prosecuted because of alleged weapons of mass destruction, or
because Saddam had (as yet unproven) connections to al-Qaeda.
The world has since come to realize this. Paul O'Neill, the
Treasury Secretary fired by President Bush, charged in his book,
The Price of Loyalty, that - just 10 days into the Bush
administration - the neo-conservative cabal that runs foreign
policy in the Bush White House was already planning to wage
war against Iraq, essentially looking for any excuse it could
find to launch the invasion and grab Iraq's massive oil reserves.
This is exactly what happened. Before relinquishing power to
the Iraqis in June, 2004, American Civil Administrator Paul
Bremer enacted what has become known as the "100 Bremer orders,"
which are intended to guarantee the liquidation of the Iraqi
domestic economy: 200 state-owned corporations must be privatized,
and may be owned up to 100% by foreign (read: American) interests.
State-run banks may be owned up to 50% by foreign investors.
Foreign companies can siphon off all profits from Iraq, but
do not have to invest in the country. In other words: modern
robber barons.
The extent to which the Bush clan, made rich from the oil industry,
mixes national politics with the special interests of certain
business circles can be seen not only in the multi-billion dollar
contracts awarded outside of the public bidding process to Halliburton,
Vice President Cheney's former employer. Since the release of
Michael Moore's documentary film Fahrenheit 9/11, the whole
world learned of the once close business relationships between
the Bush family and the Saudi Bin-Laden clan. And how Bush Senior
was directly profiting from the war through the Carlyle Group.
The title of Moore's successful documentary film evokes the
sci-fi classic Fahrenheit 451 by American author Ray Bradbury,
published in 1953. This novel is first and foremost a social
critique, warning against the dangers of suppressing free thinking
through censorship: Bradbury creates a totalitarian state of
the future, where the fire department is not putting out fires,
but instead burning books. In Bradbury's world, reading is forbidden.
The "Patriotic" Police State
It's not hard to make the leap from Bradbury's fictional world
to the reality of today's America. Incidents which are equally
ominous have been taking place with increasing frequency in
the USA ever since 9/11: Somebody's friend with an Arabic name
was arrested and disappeared for weeks, but was never charged.
Somebody else knows of a teacher who taught the Constitution
in her classroom and was censured. A student shared his political
views in a classroom and was visited by the FBI. A person was
detained for reading an airport novel that featured a gun on
its cover.
The Patriot Act, that infamous,
350-page tome of legislation that was railroaded through Congress
only 45 days after September 11th, makes it all possible. Practically
no Senator or Representative ever read it.
The Patriot Act II made the noose even tighter. Patriot Act
II, in section 403, expands the definition of "weapons of mass
destruction" to include any activity that affects US interstate
commerce or US exports...by this broad definition, getting involved
with Greenpeace could be reinterpreted as a terrorist plot...
As Congressman Ron Paul wrote in a newspaper column from August
2004: "Only a totalitarian society would even claim absolute
safety as a worthy ideal, because it would require total state
control over its citizens' lives. Freedom is not defined by
safety. Freedom is defined by the ability of citizens to live
without government interference."
If President Bush deems opponents protesting his war "unpatriotic,"
he should take to heart what his predecessor Dwight D. Eisenhower
once said: "Without exhaustive debate, even heated debate, of
ideas and programs, free government would weaken and wither.
But if we allow ourselves to be persuaded that every individual
or party that takes issue with our own convictions is necessarily
wicked or treasonous, then, indeed, we are approaching the end
of freedom's road."
That is precisely what more and more Americans want to prevent.
By the end of 2004, 364 counties and municipalities (among them
Philadelphia) in 28 states, plus four entire states, representing
50 million Americans, have passed resolutions criticizing the
Patriot Act or forbidding local law enforcement from cooperating
with the Bush administration's attack on the Bill of Rights.
Nonetheless, President Bush was re-elected - much to the dismay
of the vast majority of the rest of the world. 85% of the British
would have shipped Bush back to Texas, and on its cover page,
the Swiss newsmagazine Facts encapsulated the mindset
of "The Old World" after November 3, 2004 with the words: "Europe's
Nightmare."
Fear Corrodes the Soul
Many Americans cannot understand this. Because they truly live
in a very different world. In a world full of fear. In the November
5, 2004 edition of the German magazine Der Spiegel ,
Jody Biehl said about her compatriots: "It looks as if the only
thing Americans want nowadays is to be afraid. They suckle on
fear like a mother's teat, cling to religion and look for sanctuary
in superstitions. They want to hear that Osama bin Laden's hiding
behind the bushes, just waiting to pounce on them, and that
Iran will be the next Iraq."
The fear striking the hearts of the once greatest nation on
earth didn't just materialize from thin air.
The USA has the highest rate of gun-related crime. America's
infatuation with weapons is not to blame here, as even documentary
filmmaker Michael Moore had to acknowledge in his film Bowling
for Columbine. Though the Canadians possess more firearms
per capita, Canada's crime levels are actually much lower. In
contrast to Americans, they feel much safer - because they do
not watch American television. Moore comes to the conclusion
that the media in the U.S., bent on lurid depictions of graphic
violence, flood the American public with a daily cocktail, unmatched
anywhere else in the world, that unleashes fear and paranoia.
And a person in the grips of fear will be all the quicker to
grab for a weapon.
This lurking fear comes in very handy for Bush and his "war
on terror." Because fearing for your life makes you reach out
for protection. With its - usually ambiguous - terror alerts
("Code Red," "Code Orange," and the like), the U.S. government
is playing on the fears of an already insecure population, even
during its election campaigning. Bin Laden's video message about
"bloody terror on US territory to overshadow September 11th"
was fittingly made public only four days prior to the presidential
election.
Der Spiegel author Jody Biehl gets straight to the point: "Bush's
administration - and the American media - have been pushing
this fear as if they were stuffing a Thanksgiving turkey. There
is nothing like it in Europe - although Europe itself has been
touched by terrorist bombing attacks and kidnappings."
We Europeans are taken aback by the one-sidedness, often bordering
on manipulation, of the U.S. media. Murdoch's TV news show,
the government's lapdog Fox News, is the best example. The average
American is not aware of a lot of important things going on
in the world because he just isn't told. Katherine Graham, former
editor of The Washington Post, now deceased, once remarked:
"We live in a dirty and dangerous world. There are some things
the general public does not need to know, and shouldn't. I believe
democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate
steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether
to print what it knows."
The risk of an uninformed public being kept in the dark is welcomed
by President Bush with open arms. Indeed, shortly before the
election, 40% of Americans polled still believed that there
was a proven connection between al-Qaeda and Iraq. Every third
person was furthermore convinced that Saddam Hussein had personally
planned the September 11th attacks. A survey conducted by the
University of Maryland among Bush supporters just before the
election indicated almost three-fourths believed Iraq possessed
weapons of mass destruction.
The Word of God in Bush's
Ears
While the dissemination of information from the U.S. press corps
may be lacking, at least communications between the American
President and the Almighty have apparently not been hampered.
On June 26, 2003, the Israeli daily Ha'aretz attributes
these words to George Bush: "God told me to strike at al-Qaeda
and I struck them, and then He told me to strike at Saddam,
which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in
the Middle East."
George Bush was also re-elected because 70 million fundamentalist
Christians gave him their votes. Like them, he is a "born-again
Christian." Why shouldn't they trust a president who, four months
before the election, announces to a gathering of Amish farmers:
"I believe that God speaks through me!"
With that sentiment, George Bush finds himself in good company,
among the countless Islamic fundamentalists holding inflammatory
speeches against "decadent America." And so once again, the
world finds itself teetering on the brink of the "clash of cultures"
much invoked by the internationalists.
George Bush, a converted, former alcoholic, was able to hoist
his father into the Executive chair because he had Christian
fundamentalists from America's bible belt in his back pocket.
And now he has done the same for himself, this time without
the help of the Supreme Court. These devout Christians believe
in George Bush's divine mission. Unfortunately, they also cling
to the misguided belief in Armageddon: the apocalyptic destruction
of the world which presages the second coming of Jesus Christ.
And the firestorm of Armageddon must be ignited in Israel -
of course, after Salomon's Temple is restored to the Temple
Mount in Jerusalem, where it will replace the al-Akhsa mosque.
This explains why these Christians support the state of Israel
without reservation. Which is in turn shamelessly exploited
by war-mongering, Zionist chicken hawks in the in Bush administration
(Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith etc.), same as the virtually
omnipotent pro-Israel lobby in the USA. Independent presidential
candidate Ralph Nader did not mince words when, at a Washington
election event on June 29, 2004, he said, "The days when the
chief Israeli puppeteer [Ariel Sharon] comes to the United States
and meets with the puppet in the White House and then proceeds
to Capitol Hill, where he meets with hundreds of other puppets,
should be replaced. The Washington puppet show should be replaced."
It's no wonder that the Zionist Anti-Defamation League publicly
branded Nader a sick anti-Semite. Anyone who criticizes Israel,
according to the rationale, can be nothing other than a Jew-hater.
The "most powerful man in the world" projected a much more statesmanlike
demeanor one month beforehand, even when in doing so, he put
the cart before the horse: In May, 2004, President Bush was
unrestrained in his praise of the most powerful Zionist lobbying
group, American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)
when he declared it to be "serving the cause of America."
Nation of Nations
"Serve": a key word of this new age, in which America will and
also should play a leading roll. The richness of America's heritage
is second to none - it carries the whole world inside. People
came to this country from all four corners of the earth, their
hearts full of hope for a new, free life. Lady Liberty, that
vision of freedom at the entrance to New York's harbor, once
shone bright upon an entire continent. She is still there, torch
in hand, even if many of her wayward children have lost sight
of that common vision.
America is a nation of nations, unique and great. A nation that
is prepared to trod on the ideals of freedom with both feet
- no matter what mellifluent words flow from the tongues of
its leaders. And yet the American soul has enough power to shed
this alien influence, because the heart of the average American
is open, and good - despite all the fear instilled in him, and
despite his natural naïveté.
Paradoxically, this goodness can also be seen in the validation
of President Bush for the Oval Office: People voted based on
moral values, not platitudes. They long for morality and believe
that a down-to-earth George Bush is its better embodiment than
the intellectual urbanite John Kerry. The President's assertion
that he wants to ban same sex marriages strengthened the convictions
of conservatives in this regard. Not a bad sign, in principle.
It is precisely because the common vision of America is threatened
to be lost that We, the People of the Rest of the World, must
look to the good in the American people, and not equate it with
the current administration. We must encourage America to develop,
once and for all, its true, inner potential - which will bring
us one mighty step further toward the brotherhood of all people!
The words of President John F. Kennedy still ring true, generation
after generation: "And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what
your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country…My
fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for
you, but what TOGETHER we can do for the freedom of man!"
If
you want to know more about the issue containing this article
click here.